https://www.selleckchem.com/products/osmi-1.html
to enable the development of an effective HIV strategy in this group. Central adjudication of outcomes is common in randomized clinical trials in stroke. The rationale for adjudication is clear; centrally adjudicated outcomes should have less random and systematic errors than outcomes assessed locally by site investigators. However, adjudication brings added complexities to a clinical trial and can be costly. To assess the evidence for outcome adjudication in stroke trials. We identified 12 studies evaluating central adjudication in stro
Like
Comment
Share
