https://www.selleckchem.com/MEK.html
58, SE = .31; p less then .0001), with no statistically significant effect of peritraumatic dissociation (B = - .43, SE = .36; p = .2), or time (B = - 3.84, SE = 2.99; p = .2). Conclusion Our results suggest that peritraumatic distress might be useful to identify children at risk for developing PGD, and in need of further support. The development of early preventive strategies to prevent PGD in parentally bereaved children who experienced high peritraumatic distress is warranted.Background While empirical support for the ICD-11 distinction between p
Like
Comment
Share
