https://www.selleckchem.com/products/tpen.html
Third, under female (vs. male) editors-in-chief, women are much better represented as editorial-board members (47% vs. 36%), but the geographical diversity of editorial-board members and authorship decreases. These results reveal new local and broad contexts of gender diversity in editorship in psychology, with policy implications. Our approach also offers a methodological guideline for similar disparity research in other fields.Continuous CO2 emissions from human activities increase atmospheric CO2 concentrations and affect global climate