https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/NVP-AUY922.ht
15, 0.22 ]), exclusion of participants from analyses (differences in ES 0.13 [95% CI -0.03, 0.29]), lack of good control of incomplete outcome data (differences in ES 0.14 [95%CI -0.02, 0.30]) and analysis by "as treated"(differences in ES-0.39 [95%CI -0.99, 0.2]) or "per protocol" (differences in ES-0.46 [95%CI -0.92, 0]) analyses were more likely to have higher effects than those that did not. These findings suggest that attrition, missing data, compliance, and related biases have an influence in treatment effect estimates in rehab
Like
Comment
Share
