https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/Isradipine(Dy
10. vFFR was significantly correlated with FFR (r = 0.708, P less then 0.001) and RFR (r = 0.673, P less then 0.001). The diagnostic performance of vFFR vs. FFR was accuracy 81.8%, sensitivity 77.4%, specificity 83.9%, positive predictive value 69.9%, and negative predictive value 88.5%. The discriminative power of vFFR for FFR ≤ 0.80 or RFR ≤ 0.89 was excellent. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.87 (95% CI0.83-0.92) for FFR and 0.80 (95% CI0.73-0.88) for RFR. Conclusion Angiography-based vF
Like
Comment
Share
