https://www.selleckchem.com/products/yk-4-279.html
21) than TAS (79.32) and PAS (78.58). SAS reached higher levels earlier than TAS and PAS. PAS had a stronger association with TAS than SAS (partial eta squared, η2=0.17 and 0.13), whereas SAS significantly predicted total preclinical score (p .0001). PAS helped develop the skills of dental students during training, while SAS had an impact on their total preclinical score. Different student-centred activities are needed to support students' preclinical training in fixed prosthodontics courses. PAS helped develop the skills of denta