https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/Gefitinib.htm
99, p less then 0.01), and image noise (χ2, 21.20, p less then 0.01) due to marker presence. In 93% of cases, the median score of observers "agree" with the statement that marker-induced noise did not influence image interpretability. Marker presence did not interfere with confidence in diagnosis (χ2, 6.00, p = 0.2. CONCLUSION Inexpensive, easy producible skin markers can be used for accurate lesion marking in automated ultrasound examinations of the breast while image interpretability is preserved. Any marker-induced noise and
Aimer
Commentaire
Partagez
