https://www.selleckchem.com/products/pd173212.html
98), posterior soft-tissue repair (P = 0.5, and learning curve (P = 0.77). The acetabular implant was better positioned within the safe zone in the DAA group (relative risk = 1.17; 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.33; P = 0.01), but no significant differences were found in cup inclination (P = 0.8), anteversion (P = 0.1, and leg length discrepancy (P = 0.54). Dislocation rates after THA are not different between DAA and PA. Furthermore, no differences in the rate of dislocation were associated with cup positioning or surgical fact
Like
Comment
Share