https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/17-AAG(Geldan
7±1.1mm vs. 9.1±1.7mm, p=0.04) rather than depth (9±1.2mm vs. 8.4±1.2mm, p=0.29). There were no differences in mean contact force by group. There was no difference in total force-time integral for the 30s and 15s x 2 lesion groups (median=444(312)g∙s vs. 380(164)g∙s, p=1). CONCLUSION Compared to lesions resulting from continuous RF ablation, lesions resulting from interrupted ablation have a smaller overall lesion volume, predominantly due to smaller lesion width. These data suggest that if disruption in energy delivery occ
Like
Comment
Share
