https://www.selleckchem.com/products/gdc-0068.html
4 mm, respectively for the E-Frame mask. The random error of the E-Frame masks in the SI direction was significantly smaller than that of the Type-S. The number of cases showing displacements exceeding 10 mm in the SI direction for at least one fraction was eight (61% of 13 cases) and three (25% of 12 cases) for Type-S and E-Frame masks, respectively. Conclusions The E-Frame masks reduced the random displacements of patient's shoulders in the SI direction, effectively preventing large shoulder shifts that occurred frequently with Type-
Like
Comment
Share
