https://www.selleckchem.com/products/gdc-0032.html
4%, 16.9% and 23.5%). Adherence over all rounds and adherence per round were least accurate. Screening effectiveness was overestimated when using adherence over all rounds (mortality reductions 26.8%, 19.4% and 25.7%) and adherence per round (mortality reductions 26.8%, 19.5% and 25.9%). To conclude, number of times participated and regularity were most accurate and resulted in similar model-predicted screening effectiveness as using the observed adherence patterns. However they require longitudinal data. To facilitate international co
Curtir
Comentario
Compartilhar
